Comments on: The value of the RubySpecs http://blog.emptyway.com/2008/04/27/the-value-of-the-rubyspecs/ Programming, Web and all things Computer. Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:10:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Luis Lavena http://blog.emptyway.com/2008/04/27/the-value-of-the-rubyspecs/comment-page-1/#comment-7157 Luis Lavena Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:10:09 +0000 http://blog.emptyway.com/2008/04/27/the-value-of-the-rubyspecs/#comment-7157 I will! for the record: (library/bigdecimail) ruby 1.8.6 (2008-03-03 patchlevel 114) [i386-mswin32] and ruby 1.8.6 (2008-03-03 patchlevel 114) [i386-mingw32] 47 files, 199 examples, 1773 expectations, 0 failures, 0 errors :-D I will!

for the record: (library/bigdecimail)
ruby 1.8.6 (2008-03-03 patchlevel 114) [i386-mswin32] and
ruby 1.8.6 (2008-03-03 patchlevel 114) [i386-mingw32]

47 files, 199 examples, 1773 expectations, 0 failures, 0 errors

:-D

]]> By: Vladimir Sizikov http://blog.emptyway.com/2008/04/27/the-value-of-the-rubyspecs/comment-page-1/#comment-7153 Vladimir Sizikov Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:32:50 +0000 http://blog.emptyway.com/2008/04/27/the-value-of-the-rubyspecs/#comment-7153 Luis, WHOA!!! I totally missed that there is a rubyspec mailing list! Thanks for the update! :) P.S. For those who'd like to chat in "real-time", there is a #rubyspec IRC channel on FreeNode. Luis, WHOA!!! I totally missed that there is a rubyspec mailing list! Thanks for the update! :)

P.S. For those who’d like to chat in “real-time”, there is a #rubyspec IRC channel on FreeNode.

]]> By: Luis Lavena http://blog.emptyway.com/2008/04/27/the-value-of-the-rubyspecs/comment-page-1/#comment-7152 Luis Lavena Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:52:16 +0000 http://blog.emptyway.com/2008/04/27/the-value-of-the-rubyspecs/#comment-7152 Great news Vladimir! I'll love we have more contribution and feedback in the RubySpecs google group (http://groups.google.com/group/rubyspec) so all Ruby implementers agree on some of these changes that shouldn't overlap but also expose things across platforms. Again, great work Vladimir! Great news Vladimir!

I’ll love we have more contribution and feedback in the RubySpecs google group (http://groups.google.com/group/rubyspec) so all Ruby implementers agree on some of these changes that shouldn’t overlap but also expose things across platforms.

Again, great work Vladimir!

]]>